01 / 30 DAYS’ NOTICE · AUGUST 7, 2026
“After reflecting on our discussion, however, our decision remains unchanged, and we will be providing 30 days’ notice under our agreement.”
WINNIPEG / DEALERSHIP RECORD
Court records. Documented accounts. Available responses.
Examine the information collected here before making your decision.
01 / THE VTB PAYMENT DISPUTE
VTB’s filed Notice of Claim associates Winnipeg Honda with 75040 Manitoba Ltd.. It allocates $2,520.00 of the $15,630.80 principal claim to that company. This is the amount claimed for that company, not a separate judgment award.
The supplied October 13, 2026 default order names six corporate defendants and records failure to file a Reply and proof of service. The supplied garnishing order records $16,265.82 including attachment costs. Service and recovery have not been independently verified.
The additional Manitoba court-file collection includes an MPIC claim listed for a first appearance on October 19, 2026 in the registry reviewed October 17; its later status has not been checked. It also includes the Schirrmeister, Truong and Chiappetta proceedings, each recorded as discontinued. The customer-account collection contains a disputed A/C warranty complaint and the dealership’s response.
THE CORRESPONDENCE / GROUP PAYMENT DISPUTE

01 / 30 DAYS’ NOTICE · AUGUST 7, 2026
“After reflecting on our discussion, however, our decision remains unchanged, and we will be providing 30 days’ notice under our agreement.”
02 / PAYMENT LIMITED TO AUGUST 17 · AUGUST 19, 2026
“Accordingly, we will conclude services effective August 17 and will pay for services rendered through that date.”
These excerpts concern notice and the proposed payment cutoff. In between, Dhiya offered to continue through September 7 if services continued as contemplated; VTB responded about restoring access and maintained its payment position. VTB disputes agreeing to shorten the notice period. The judgment names corporate defendants, not Dhiya personally.
Read the intervening exchange and both parties’ positions →02 / SEPARATE PROCEEDINGS
Files involving the associated company in the records reviewed October 17, 2026. These are separate from VTB’s case. A filed claim is not a finding of wrongdoing. Discontinuances, payments and unknown outcomes are included. This collection is not an exhaustive litigation search.
Winnipeg Honda
SC26-01-49686
Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation v. 75040 Manitoba Ltd. and Winnipeg Honda
The registry records a claim under the MPIC Act filed July 13, 2026, and a defence filed August 20.
A first appearance is listed for October 19, 2026. No decision appears in the displayed docket. The underlying allegations have not been reviewed.
Multiple corporate defendants

CI07-01-50697
Corporate Media Services Ltd. v. Ashok Dilawri and five companies
The February 15, 2007 claim names Ashok Dilawri, Ashok Management Inc., Anika Holdings Inc., 75040 Manitoba Ltd., Dilawri Holdings Inc. and Destination Motors Inc.
All defendants filed a defence on March 21, 2007. No judgment or disposition appears in the displayed docket. The claim’s substance and ultimate outcome are not established here.
75040 Manitoba Ltd.
CI23-01-41485
Walter Schirrmeister v. 75040 Manitoba Ltd.
A claim was filed June 9, 2023, followed by a defence on August 11, 2023.
The claim was discontinued by consent on September 18, 2024. The docket does not establish the reasons or any settlement terms. Discontinuance is not a finding of liability.
Winnipeg Honda
SC24-01-45307
Weichi Truong v. 75040 Manitoba Ltd. and Winnipeg Honda
A property-damage claim was filed May 22, 2024. Both defendants filed a defence on June 18.
A December 23, 2024 notice records discontinuance before judgment. The scheduled hearing was withdrawn; no liability finding is established by this docket.
Winnipeg Honda
CI21-01-31095
Pier Chiappetta v. 75040 Manitoba Ltd.
The registry records a May 7, 2021 claim and a June 7 defence by 75040 Manitoba Ltd., carrying on business as Winnipeg Honda.
A notice of discontinuance was filed November 16, 2021. The displayed record does not establish a judgment, admission or settlement terms.
03 / SELECTED NEGATIVE CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
Selected negative accounts from the sources linked below, with available business responses and reported resolutions. These third-party accounts are not independently verified or representative of every customer’s experience. They are not findings in VTB’s case. Review dates and source-review context are preserved.
Winnipeg Honda
BBB complaint · October 1, 2026 · Answered
The customer’s account
The customer alleged warranty A/C work was conditional on paying for an evaporator repair.
The dealer denied refusing covered repairs, attributed displayed retail pricing to software defaults and cited the remaining leak. After the customer rejected its response, it recommended contacting Honda Canada.